INVENTORY LOG CONTROL
Check Inventory Log Variances
Require a named close reviewer and evidence before a revised inventory log replaces the master.

01 / CONTEXT
Define the control decision
A technically accessible file can still be inaccurate, incomplete or inconsistent with inventory close procedure. The release decision should show what changed, who reviewed it and which version became effective.
Require a named close reviewer and evidence before a revised inventory log replaces the master.
02 / PROCEDURE
Run the control sequence
- 01
Capture the proposed version and change summary.
- 02
Assign a close reviewer independent of the editor where practical.
- 03
Check required fields, instructions and period variants.
- 04
Record approval without embedding supplier, SKU, pricing or customer information.
- 05
Replace the master through the documented release route.
03 / EVIDENCE
Preserve proof without personal data
A defensible control record identifies the inventory-log owner, approved filename, closed-period edition, authoritative storage path, permitted editors, close reviewer, backup evidence and next review date. It should not contain supplier, SKU, pricing, employee, customer or credential information. Use fictional inventory logs during every technical test.
Recheck the arrangement after changes to Windows, storage, Folder Protect, permissions, staff roles or the inventory-log set. Confirm both usability and recovery: an authorized user should reach the released inventory log, an unauthorized account should not alter the master, and the recovery owner should restore the approved closed-period edition without depending on the working folder. Preserve evidence of unexpected behavior instead of repeatedly changing controls.
Keep the claim narrow. Local restrictions can reduce accidental access or changes on a tested computer, but they do not determine inventory accounting rules, validate counts or adjustments, administer identities, provide accounting-close evidence, create version history or replace backup. Escalate those requirements to the system and owner responsible for them.
During review, ask a second operator to follow the written procedure without verbal help. Record whether the person can identify the master, create the intended working copy, recognize the current release and find the recovery owner. This usability check reveals ambiguous filenames, hidden dependencies and undocumented knowledge before a real period-close deadline. Correct the procedure, then repeat the test with a clean fictional inventory log and retain only minimal, non-personal evidence.
04 / BOUNDARY
State what the control cannot prove
File access controls cannot establish inventory accuracy, accounting close, WMS authority or fraud detection.
Validate the exact Windows account, storage path and current software release. If centralized workflow, immutable history, identity governance, legal retention or accounting-close evidence are required, select systems designed for those jobs rather than broadening a desktop-control claim.
05 / SOURCES
Primary references
References support specific controls and do not imply endorsement.